How they let the right man slip away
Published on December 3, 2006 By Larry Kuperman In Religion
Joel Hunter is the pastor of the Northland Church, a board member of many Christian organizations, a noteworthy author and scholar. For a brief period of time he was also the President of the Christian Coalition. But he left (or was asked to leave) because he wanted to expand the agenda beyond opposition to gay marriage and abortion, wanting to take on issues like poverty and disease.

"I look forward to … expanding our mission to concern itself with the care of creation, helping society's marginalized, human rights/religious issues and compassion issues," Hunter said in a press release announcing his appointment.

The board of the Christian Coalition wasn't about to stand for that.

Roberta Combs, who is the chair of the coalition's four-member board of directors, explained the boards opposition to Hunter. "We're a political organization, and there's a way to do things, like taking a survey of your members and seeing what they need," she said. "Joel had a different way of doing things, so he just went out there."

It should be noted that Rev. Hunter is the author of a book criticizing the way the Religious Right has engaged in political tactics, titled Right Wing, Wrong Bird: Why the Tactics of the Religious Right Won't Fly With Most Conservative Christians.

Could the coalition have been unaware of Hunter's compassionate point of view before appointing him? That is a pretty big gaff.

I wonder what the board thinks of this:

"Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. ...Verily I say unto you, In as much as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."

Do you think Jesus is too liberal for the coalition?


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 05, 2006
But then you have to admit that the line of defense against your suggestions are the people that the Christian Coalition is being vilified for NOT SUPPORTING. Can you imagine the remotest possibility of that being undertaken under Democrat leadership? HIV is so insipidly tied to homosexuality and sexual 'liberation' that any effort to stem the one is seen as an attack on the rest.

I don't agree with the Christian Coalition. I don't like them, and I think Pat Robertson is a vile human being and I don't think much could ever come from anything he ever tried to do. That said, there are parallels between what I believe and their ham-fisted efforts.

The problem isn't handing out condoms or teaching people safe sexual practices. The problem is that in the Democratic party you can't do that without the efforts being hijacked by those who want to promote a SOCIAL agenda that rejects any condemnation of sexual promiscuity or punitive action for those who harm others through it. Just as being anti-abortion is a perceived affront to sexual liberation, vilifying those who DESERVE to be vilified regarding the HIV epidemic is anathema.
on Dec 05, 2006
There's a saying in Australia: "Everything happens in the US." I think this is one of these situations. Your system is very screwed up if your country is incapable of acting in the interests of its citizens. I haven't a clue what you can do about it. The Christian Coalition's strategy doesn't seem that rational - abstinence works for some, sure, but it's not broad enough to do the most good in communities where HIV infection is fastest growing, ie those communities who traditionally don't accept the authority of the religious.

PNG's had some successes combining church programs with NGO action - the Anglican church in particular. Maybe the US could learn from them?
on Dec 05, 2006
"There's a saying in Australia: "Everything happens in the US." I think this is one of these situations. Your system is very screwed up if your country is incapable of acting in the interests of its citizens."


That's the problem, they all think they are acting in the interest of citizens. The Christian Coalition is acting against efforts that they believe have been proven to be failed. Their opponents believe that keeping unfettered sexuality, in all its most vile and abusive forms, is sacrosanct and any condemnation of it is a "slippery slope" issue. We're lucky we can even have laws regarding sexual crimes at all.

The kind of initiatives you mention are an impossibility now. The attempts by Bush to foster private charity and social outreach were condemned tirelessly as an imposition of religion. Now with the Dems in office there'll be no cooperative effort between any faith-based organization and the government.
2 Pages1 2