How was she ever picked?
Published on September 5, 2008 By Larry Kuperman In Republican

Conventional wisdom states that only twice in recent memory have Vice Presidential candidates swung elections: Lyndon Johnson helping John Kennedy win and Thomas Eagleton causing George McGovern to lose in the most lopsided election in American history.

Sarah Palin stands ready to become the new Thomas Eagleton, an albatross around the neck of John McCain that calls into serious doubt his ability to make decisions. There are three major reasons for my saying this:

Troopergate: The is significent evidence that Sarah Palin misused her authority as govenor of Alaska.

Anchorage Daily News, August 14th, 2008- "Gov. Sarah Palin on Wednesday revealed an audio recording that shows an aide pressuring the Public Safety Department to fire a state trooper embroiled in a custody battle with her sister.

Palin, who has previously said her administration didn't exert pressure to get rid of trooper Mike Wooten, also disclosed that members of her staff had made about two dozen contacts with public safety officials about the trooper.

"I do now have to tell Alaskans that such pressure could have been perceived to exist although I have only now become aware of it," Palin said.

But Palin said her decision to fire Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan last month had nothing to do with his refusal to dump trooper Mike Wooten.

The governor said evidence of what she called a "smoking gun" conversation, and other calls made by her aides, only recently surfaced as the attorney general started an inquiry at her request into the circumstances surrounding her firing of Monegan. Palin wanted the review because a special investigator hired by the Legislature is about to investigate the firing and a legislator has been quoted in a newspaper story talking about impeachment."

Bold is mine for emphasis. Yeah, if you acknowledge that your staff made at least twenty-four phone calls to get your ex-brother-in-law fired, there MIGHT be the perception that you exerted pressure. I am sure that all good Republicans will believe that Walt Monegan's firing when he refused to illegally fire a State Trooper with a clean record was just a remarkable coincidence......

Lets see what Mr. Monegan said: "A few days later, Monegan came forward, stating that he had been pressured by those around Palin to fire Wooten -- but had refused to do so -- a choice that he believes led to his sudden dismissal. Palin denied Monegan's accusations, and a Legislative Council has appointed a special commission to probe the matter."

In an attampt to diffuse the matter, Palin has asked the State Attorney General, who reports to her, to investigate her, in addition to the special prosecutor already hired by the Legislature.

Bridge to Nowhere: Palin's highly touted cost-cutting measure will not stand up to public scrutiny.

Boston Herald, August 31st, 2008- "When John McCain introduced Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate Friday, her reputation as a tough-minded budget-cutter was front and center.

"I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere," Palin told the cheering McCain crowd, referring to Ketchikan’s Gravina Island bridge in Alaska.

But Palin was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it.

The Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them "nowhere." They’re still feeling pain today in Ketchikan, over Palin’s subsequent decision to use the bridge funds for other projects - and over the timing of her announcement, which they say came in a pre-dawn press release that seemed aimed at national news deadlines.

"I think that’s when the campaign for national office began," said Ketchikan mayor Bob Weinstein on Saturday.

Meanwhile, Weinstein noted, the state is continuing to build a road on Gravina Island to an empty beach where the bridge would have gone - because federal money for the access road, unlike the bridge money, would have otherwise been returned to the federal government."

How your (and my) tax dollars are being carefully spent- we are paying for a road that would have gone to a Bridge to Nowhere, had that bridge actually been built. Additionally, residents that still live in the Nowhere that is now without a bridge, voted for her because she promised them that bridge. What other promises to voters will she reneg on?

The Plane Sale: McCain repeated this lie last night. And lie it is, "plane" and simple.

NY Daily News, September 5th, 2008- "The folksy tale of how Gov. Sarah Palin saved Alaska millions by unloading the state jet on eBay is fast becoming a campaign fish-that-got-away tale.

Sen. John McCain not only repeated that story on the stump Friday to tout his Republican running mate, but added, "She made a profit, too."

The truth is that Palin couldn't find a buyer last year when she tried to peddle to plane on eBay - and lost the state money when she did sell it.

Palin's predecessor, Frank Murkowski, originally bought the 20-year-old Westwing II for the state of Alaska for $2.7 million. She listed it on eBay for $2.5 million.

When no offers came in, Palin hired a jet broker - Turbo North Aviation in Anchorage - which sold the jet for $2.1 million to an Alaska businessman."

Larry Reynolds, the businessman that bought the plane, brokered the deal through Rep. John Harris, R-Valdez, who is now Speaker of the State House. Such a deal he got! Oh, did I mention that Reynolds was also a contributor to Harris' campaign?

No doubt Govenor Palin will plead ignorance and she has the credentials to support her claim. She attended 5 colleges in six years, before finally graduating from the University of Idaho in 1987. Certainly she will claim that the press is out to get her. Why not? After all, when she finally did graduate, it was with a degree in journalism.


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Sep 10, 2008

Boy, Dr. guy, you are really bending over backwards to try to hold me to a standard that you yourself have never even come close to.

Well, that's to be expected.  You see, when one professes conservativism, you're not held to any standards anymore on this site - you can say whatever you want and get away with it.

on Sep 10, 2008

Boy, Dr. guy, you are really bending over backwards to try to hold me to a standard that you yourself have never even come close to. I cited source and date for each article. Easily verifiable. Nor, if you looked up the articles, did what I post contradicte the tone of any article. How is that unethical?

Barack Obama’s reference to “lipstick on a pig” .... a slap at VP nominee Sarah Palin

Here is a quote from a reputable source.  CNN actually.  Seems clear from the quote that Obama was calling Palin a pig, right?  So it cant be refuted.

That is your logic.  However, reading the whole story indicates that is not the whole truth.  But since I referenced the story and it was reputable, it must be right?  And that is all you get. So what do you believe?

That in essence is what you did.  Cherry picked.  But you are wrong.  While I am the first to admit that I have made mistakes (and so admitted it to you), I do try to be fair and only call a pig a pig when it is a pig.  I thought you did the same as well - until now.  For whatever reason, you are now just another mesmerized Obamabot.  Nothing illegal about that.  And your ethics are your own, so I am glad you can excuse it away.  But dont sell me your bilge water and call it Eau de Toilet.

on Sep 12, 2008

Those of you who say that the people who support McCain/Palin are stupid or flawed in some way, are wrong! I am from a family of Republicans and have many Republican friends. None of us are stupid, all of us have good educations, are well read, consider other points of view and have strong traditional values. So, do not insult me because I don't agree with you. I live in a liberal college town and that seems to be the first strategy among libs--attack the enemy's intelligence, I guess so the opponents reconsider to be "smart" like them. It hasnt changed my mind and has only made me more resolute in my thinking. 

McCain/Palin '08   

on Sep 14, 2008

Looks more & more that you're assessment & prediction are going to be frustrated, Larry.

At this point, Biden is looking more like BO's Eagleton than Palen is looking like McCain's.  Of course, I'm ignoring the fact that the Eagleton scenario involved a real health issue, rather than an alleged political liability issue.

I'm sure someone will come back with the claim that vetting is the real issue, but if BO had been 'vetted' in the way Palin's opponents would have vetted her, he would never have been allowed to run.

on Sep 14, 2008

hey Larry, you just don't write enought!

First remember Innocent until proven guilty? that pretty much sums up Palin firing her ex-brother in law.

There has to be a reason why the left is throwing so much crap at her life, could it be that they are afraid she might be the one reason people might vote Republican when there is no other?

I don't like McCain. Like Oboma even less, Biden is a jerk the one bright spot in this campaign is Palin.

on Sep 14, 2008

Ms Palin has already decided to declare war on Russia if they get out of hand. Does she have any troops left?

on Sep 14, 2008

Ms Palin has already decided to declare war on Russia if they get out of hand. Does she have any troops left?

No, Ms. Palin would not have any troops - the VP does not command any troops.  But the president commands many,.  So when do we start bombing Pakistan?

on Sep 14, 2008

Ms Palin has already decided to declare war on Russia if they get out of hand. Does she have any troops left?

That was so insane. All Palin said was that she wanted Georgia to become part of NATO. If Russians attack any member of NATO, all NATO members would have to respond. This policy goes back to WWII, so its odd that the press would have run a headline like, 'Palin seeks to attack Russia,' or whatever crazy thing they said. Whats even more insane is that you believe it.

on Sep 14, 2008

At this point, Biden is looking more like BO's Eagleton than Palen is looking like McCain's.

Yeah, I haven't seen Palin telling and quadriplegic people to "Stand up!!!" At least not lately.

on Sep 14, 2008

I need to apologize for not keeping up on this, I can only offer the press of work and home life have priority.

Lipstickmama, please note that I have not called anyone stupid, in this post or any other that I can recall.

Anthony R and Dr. Guy are quite correct. If you heard her interview in the entirety, Ms. Palin's remarks were temperate, especially her re-interpretation of the so-called "Bush Doctrine." Unfortunately her remarks were "cherry picked," something that I would never do....okay, joking there. She never said nor implied that she would declare war on Russia, nor for that matter ever wrote a "blank check for war" to Israel.

On the other hand....for anyone who cares, Sarah Palin's husband and 12 others have been subpoened as part of an investigation into the dismissal of Walt Monegan, the former public service commissioner. Not judging her guilty, perhaps some will dismiss it as partisan politics. Will the investigation hurt the Republican campaign? My opinion is that it will.

By the way, source: http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed7/idUSN1246165920080914

Moderateman, thank you so much for posting. We sometimes agree, more often disagree, but you are always most welcome. As you said to me once in a time of need, stay strong.

Daiwa, if I have not expressed it sufficiently before, thank you for your well-reasoned and challenging remarks. The Biden case is troubling, The money has been given back, his son has quit the lobbying firm, but perhaps late.

Dr. Guy, I fully admit to being fallible, biased, even opinionated. It was "unethical" that I disagreed with. And strongly disagreed with at that.

Time and again, her successes have been oeverstated, exagerrated. Let me offer this quote from the Wall Street Journal, not exactly a left-wing publication:

"Gov. Palin likes to boast that she finally got Alaska’s big natural-gas pipeline project moving, after years of false starts. She did sign a contract with TransCanada, a pipeline company, to eventually build a pipeline that would carry gas from Alaska’s North Slope down the lower 48 states.

But the state’s agreement with TransCanada doesn’t include any guarantees the pipeline will actually be built. And Alaska hasn’t locked up the gas needed to fill the pipeline. In that sense, Gov. Palin’s barekknuckle approach to the diversified international oil giants–steps like raising the royalty fees oil companies pay the state–may make it tougher for her to fulfill her domestic-energy promises."

Let me add a quote from Bert Stedman, Republican co-chair of the Alaska state senate finance committee:

Ms. Palin’s bill seemed intentionally written to keep the three major Alaska oil producers from submitting proposals. Demonizing Big Oil, he added, could come back to haunt the state. “It’s a sad state of affairs, but it’s true: if you look at the politics of the state and you want to have a devil, you can point at Exxon, as well as at BP and Conoco,” Mr. Stedman said. “It is good politics.”

Article in its entirety: http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/09/11/palins-pipeline-pols-jabs-at-big-oil-could-come-back-to-hurt-them/

From the Houston Chronicle: "An examination of the project has found that she has overstated both the progress that has been made and the certainty of success.

The pipeline exists only on paper. The first section has yet to be laid, federal approvals are years away, and the pipeline will not be completed for at least a decade.

In fact, the pipeline might never be built."

Source: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/5994825.html

You can add the claim regarding Federal earmarks to the list of exagerrations. Acknowledging that Ms. Palin did in fact REDUCE requests for Federal earmarks, John McCain agreed that she did not eliminate them:

"John McCain got it wrong Friday when he asserted that his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, had not requested any earmarks, the spending directives lawmakers insert in spending bills that McCain has vowed to eliminate.

Palin, in fact, requested $198 million in federal earmarks in February, including such expenses as $487,000 to fight obesity in Alaska and $4 million to develop recreational trails."

Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-earmarks13-2008sep13,0,4231195.story

A week and more after I posted the original article all the statements I made have been supported. The investigation into Trooper-gate is proceeding, the Highway to Nowhere is costing Federal taxpayors $100 million, the plane is acknowledged to have been sold at a loss, other statements such as the gas pipeline and earmarks have been greatly exagerrated.

Nothing unethical about my calling a lie what it is, a lie.

on Sep 15, 2008

The investigation into Trooper-gate is proceeding

That hardly makes the allegation of 'misuse of authority' any more true than it was 10 days ago.

the plane is acknowledged to have been sold at a loss

Acknowledged by whom, and on the basis of what valuation?  I haven't heard that.

other statements such as the gas pipeline and earmarks have been greatly exagerrated

Without defending the statements, per se, do you really believe that BO's 'achievements' have not been exagerrated?  This is politics.  We're all grown ups.  We can figure it out.

And thanks for your kind words.  Here's back at ya.

on Sep 15, 2008

From one of my replies in another thread on this topic:

For all the effort apparently going on up in Wasilla & Fairbanks to find the 'smoking gun' you'd think they could come up with something better than this:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26695078

We really need to know about the 'lively debate' over a B&B ordinance?  In their mightily strained efforts to make the inane appear 'evil' and the ordinary appear 'unworthy,' they reveal for all to see their condescension, arrogance, stupidity and bias.  I would have no problem with such 'investigative journalism' if we were getting the same level of drill-down on BO, but we're not - the particulars of his background have been largely glossed over in favor of superficial fluff or, worse, turning a blind eye.

on Sep 15, 2008

Acknowledged by whom, and on the basis of what valuation? I haven't heard that.

Governments do not depreciate.  Since depreciation is solely a tax gimmick, and governments (in the US at least) do not pay taxes, all assets are listed at the purchase price.  So saying it was sold "at a loss" is technically correct.  But hardly a scandal, and indeed if the valuation was done at market, instead of book, it would be incorrect.

Time and again, her successes have been oeverstated, exagerrated

Of course they are!  It is politics after all.  I dont think you are, but for the record, are you then implying that Obama's are not being overstated and exagerated?  Breaking news!  The sun rose in the east today!  Film at 11.

on Sep 15, 2008

Thanks for the explanation, Dr. Guy.  Makes sense, so I'm glad to award Larry a point on a technicality.

on Sep 15, 2008

Acknowledged by whom, and on the basis of what valuation? I haven't heard that.

 

Hey Daiwa, when was the last time you bought a vehicle and later sold it for a profit?

4 Pages1 2 3 4