How was she ever picked?
Published on September 5, 2008 By Larry Kuperman In Republican

Conventional wisdom states that only twice in recent memory have Vice Presidential candidates swung elections: Lyndon Johnson helping John Kennedy win and Thomas Eagleton causing George McGovern to lose in the most lopsided election in American history.

Sarah Palin stands ready to become the new Thomas Eagleton, an albatross around the neck of John McCain that calls into serious doubt his ability to make decisions. There are three major reasons for my saying this:

Troopergate: The is significent evidence that Sarah Palin misused her authority as govenor of Alaska.

Anchorage Daily News, August 14th, 2008- "Gov. Sarah Palin on Wednesday revealed an audio recording that shows an aide pressuring the Public Safety Department to fire a state trooper embroiled in a custody battle with her sister.

Palin, who has previously said her administration didn't exert pressure to get rid of trooper Mike Wooten, also disclosed that members of her staff had made about two dozen contacts with public safety officials about the trooper.

"I do now have to tell Alaskans that such pressure could have been perceived to exist although I have only now become aware of it," Palin said.

But Palin said her decision to fire Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan last month had nothing to do with his refusal to dump trooper Mike Wooten.

The governor said evidence of what she called a "smoking gun" conversation, and other calls made by her aides, only recently surfaced as the attorney general started an inquiry at her request into the circumstances surrounding her firing of Monegan. Palin wanted the review because a special investigator hired by the Legislature is about to investigate the firing and a legislator has been quoted in a newspaper story talking about impeachment."

Bold is mine for emphasis. Yeah, if you acknowledge that your staff made at least twenty-four phone calls to get your ex-brother-in-law fired, there MIGHT be the perception that you exerted pressure. I am sure that all good Republicans will believe that Walt Monegan's firing when he refused to illegally fire a State Trooper with a clean record was just a remarkable coincidence......

Lets see what Mr. Monegan said: "A few days later, Monegan came forward, stating that he had been pressured by those around Palin to fire Wooten -- but had refused to do so -- a choice that he believes led to his sudden dismissal. Palin denied Monegan's accusations, and a Legislative Council has appointed a special commission to probe the matter."

In an attampt to diffuse the matter, Palin has asked the State Attorney General, who reports to her, to investigate her, in addition to the special prosecutor already hired by the Legislature.

Bridge to Nowhere: Palin's highly touted cost-cutting measure will not stand up to public scrutiny.

Boston Herald, August 31st, 2008- "When John McCain introduced Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate Friday, her reputation as a tough-minded budget-cutter was front and center.

"I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere," Palin told the cheering McCain crowd, referring to Ketchikan’s Gravina Island bridge in Alaska.

But Palin was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it.

The Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them "nowhere." They’re still feeling pain today in Ketchikan, over Palin’s subsequent decision to use the bridge funds for other projects - and over the timing of her announcement, which they say came in a pre-dawn press release that seemed aimed at national news deadlines.

"I think that’s when the campaign for national office began," said Ketchikan mayor Bob Weinstein on Saturday.

Meanwhile, Weinstein noted, the state is continuing to build a road on Gravina Island to an empty beach where the bridge would have gone - because federal money for the access road, unlike the bridge money, would have otherwise been returned to the federal government."

How your (and my) tax dollars are being carefully spent- we are paying for a road that would have gone to a Bridge to Nowhere, had that bridge actually been built. Additionally, residents that still live in the Nowhere that is now without a bridge, voted for her because she promised them that bridge. What other promises to voters will she reneg on?

The Plane Sale: McCain repeated this lie last night. And lie it is, "plane" and simple.

NY Daily News, September 5th, 2008- "The folksy tale of how Gov. Sarah Palin saved Alaska millions by unloading the state jet on eBay is fast becoming a campaign fish-that-got-away tale.

Sen. John McCain not only repeated that story on the stump Friday to tout his Republican running mate, but added, "She made a profit, too."

The truth is that Palin couldn't find a buyer last year when she tried to peddle to plane on eBay - and lost the state money when she did sell it.

Palin's predecessor, Frank Murkowski, originally bought the 20-year-old Westwing II for the state of Alaska for $2.7 million. She listed it on eBay for $2.5 million.

When no offers came in, Palin hired a jet broker - Turbo North Aviation in Anchorage - which sold the jet for $2.1 million to an Alaska businessman."

Larry Reynolds, the businessman that bought the plane, brokered the deal through Rep. John Harris, R-Valdez, who is now Speaker of the State House. Such a deal he got! Oh, did I mention that Reynolds was also a contributor to Harris' campaign?

No doubt Govenor Palin will plead ignorance and she has the credentials to support her claim. She attended 5 colleges in six years, before finally graduating from the University of Idaho in 1987. Certainly she will claim that the press is out to get her. Why not? After all, when she finally did graduate, it was with a degree in journalism.


Comments (Page 4)
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4 
on Sep 15, 2008

Hey Daiwa, when was the last time you bought a vehicle and later sold it for a profit?

When Tony Rezko bought it from me.

on Sep 15, 2008

I was able to sell one of my cars a few years ago for more than the corresponding BB value so technically I made a 'profit.'

on Sep 15, 2008

I still don't get what the advertisement is doing in the middle of the body of Larry's article.  Anybody else seeing that?

on Sep 15, 2008

I was able to sell one of my cars a few years ago for more than the corresponding BB value so technically I made a 'profit.'

Ok, let me be more specific.  How many times or how often do you sell a vehicle that you sold it for more than you paid?  The point being that most vehicles depreciate quickly after purchase. 

 

I still don't get what the advertisement is doing in the middle of the body of Larry's article. Anybody else seeing that?
.

Yes I see it.  I've noticed it on a few other blogs as well.

 

on Sep 15, 2008

A-D -

To answer your specific question, never of course.  Despite Dr. Guy's explanation, even a government has to sell assets at a price the market will bear.  Why buy a used piece of equipment at the retail asking price when you can have a new one for the same cost?  It's all a tempest in a teapot, anyway.

on Sep 15, 2008

Despite Dr. Guy's explanation, even a government has to sell assets at a price the market will bear.

Yea, but it makes great headlines.  15 years ago, the State AG audited the agency I was working at, and the headlines blared "Agency loses $250,000 in COmputer equipment!"  That was when $250,000 was real money!  But nothing was lost.  We had sent a bunch of old clunkers to a Tech School (state run so the state still had the stuff) so their kids could get experience working on them for a vocation.  They were not worth the freight to ship them (old 8086, 86000, and 80286s back in 93???), but still on the books for purchased value! (about $2k-$4k each).

on Dec 03, 2008

Turns out 'Troopergate' was a tempest in a teapot after all.

4 PagesFirst 2 3 4