Cartoons of Mohammed Spark Controversy
Published on February 2, 2006 By Larry Kuperman In Current Events
A Danish newspaper printed a series of cartoons, caricatures if you will, of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed that have sparked a controversy with world wide ramifications. The cartoons have since been republished in a variety of newspapers in France, Germany, Italy and Spain and have sparked demonstrations and riots across the Muslim world.

In France the front page of the France-Soir tabloid carried the headline "Yes, We Have the Right to Caricature God" and reprinted the cartoons. (The managing editor has since been fired. "We express our regrets to the Muslim community and all people who were shocked by the publication of the cartoons," France Soir's Egyptian-born owner Raymond Lakah said. )

Understand that Islamic law forbids the depiction of the Prophet. By their standards this was "blasphemy."

I am a free speech advocate...or at least I like to think of myself in that way. But this is not free speech. This is HATE. Germany has strict laws prohibiting Nazi materials. This is no different. The cartoons were published to appeal to people who resent Muslim immigrants. Predictably the cartoons provoked a violent reaction. Why would they not? The cartoons were not topical, they did not lampoon a current political figure or situation. They were intended to offend and instigate.

Understand that this has a context. It is mere months since the riots in France, brought on by the shooting deaths of Islamic youths by French police. There have been riots in the Netherlands and in Denmark against the Muslims living there. Europe, every country in Europe, has a history of crimes against minorities living within their borders. And in recent memory I might add.

Die Welt in Germany rationalized its "legal" action by pointing that "Syrian TV had depicted Jewish rabbis as cannibals." As though Germany has a long history of upholding Jewish rights.

An excellent commentary has been written by Rachard Itani here: Link

I know that when Europe begins to publish hateful materials against Arabs, hatred against Jews is soon to follow. As Chris Rock says, "That train is NEVER late."

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 04, 2006
For other thoughts, you might visit these blog sites:

Gideon MacLeish ""Religion of Peace" Burns Embassies" Link

BakerStreet "Imposed Respect: Put Up or Shut Up" Link

EmperorofIceCream "Muslims, Cartoons and a new Age of Religous Wars" Link

on Feb 04, 2006
Protected AND hate speech, which is what you don't seem to get. People can't be forced by law not to hate people, and quelling expression just makes them more hateful and bitter. And, as I said, if today we classify *some* speech as being hurtful and therefore illegal, such overwhelming power can be used later to prevent other speech.

It may sound good to outlaw racism, but that's only coming from the perspective of your definition of racism. Some extend that to sexual preference. Others would extend that to political philosophy, and then BAM, you are legally barred from being disrespectful to the powers that be.

We should have the right to be racists, since racism is so eternally subjective as to defy definition. We should have the right to voice that racism for the same reason. By your standard, Kupe, every mosque that calls for the destruction of Israel should be shut down. Can you stomach that, knowing that in a few years an Arab majority might turn those powers back on you?

To carry your own analogy further, were the Jews allowed to speak publicly against about Nazis shortly before and during WW2? Truth is somethign that Nazis of any generation want to keep under wraps. Are you promoting the spreading of truth by handing the government power to limit what people can express?
on Mar 04, 2006
No matter how the media responsible want to justify these actions the truth is, this is designed to a) seel papers and this done by being insightful, no contrbution was made to improve understanding of any culture. Its as if these people don't even care what happens at a global level, just sell more papers. The first step towards peace between all clutures is to understand and respect each other, this is how we become civilised, not with technology or wealth.
2 Pages1 2