Why the church should be grateful
Published on May 27, 2006 By Larry Kuperman In Religion
It is amazing to me the amount of debate that there has been regarding the Dan Brown book and movie, when the real conspiracy by the Catholic Church goes seemingly unnoticed. The Catholic Church should be grateful for the Da Vinci Code books and movie because the furor surrounding those fictional events serves as a distraction from the true pattern of sexual abuse and concealment.

In 2004, the Catholic Church in the United States received an internal report placing the substantiated allegations against more than 4000 priests and others under vows at over 11,000 in the US alone during the last 50 years. See Link for the source. Quoting from the report prepared for the Church by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice "More than 80 percent of the alleged victims were male, and the most common were males between 11 and 14. The allegations peaked in the 1970s, and the number of priests and others under vows to the church who were accused of abuse totaled 4,392, about 4 percent of all priests. he majority of priests [56 percent] were alleged to have abused one victim. 149 priests [3.5 percent], those who allegedly had 10 or more victims, accounted for 27 percent of all allegations of sexual abuse by priests."

The report offered the following chilling conclusion "Given the lag time typically found in reporting of child abuse, it is likely additional victims will come forward," the study said. More recently, the total number has been revised to over 15,000. That works out to almost one incident per day for fifty years. And these only represent the number of REPORTED incidents that the Church found credible. Since most cases of sexual abuse are not reported, this may only be the tip of the iceberg. According to the report the true number may be 10 times higher.

Only 2% of the accused actually were incarcerated. When the Church heard of allegations, priests were moved from location to location, senior officials acted in a criminal manner by failing to report allegations to the police and in some documented cases payments were made to families to ensure their silence. This isn't supposition or theory; priests have been convicted. Cardinal Law resigned over this issue, for example.

Even Church officials charged with overseeing matters have behaved in a highly questionable manner. For example In May 2001, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and later elected Pope Benedict XVI on the death of his predecessor, sent a letter to all Catholic Bishops declaring that the Church's investigations into claims of child sex abuse claims were subject to the pontifical secret and were not to be reported to law enforcement, on pain of excommunication. In other words "Don't ask, don't tell or your soul will burn in Hell." (My words, but the memo is documented at Link)

These are NOT isolated events, but rather an ongoing pattern. An examination of the data shows that the problem has its roots in the core practices of the Catholic Church. In a report prepared by the Center for the Study of Religious Issues states: "The evidence is so strong that we can predict a continuation of the crime as long as mandatory celibacy exists in the priesthood." Further "A demonstrable link exists between mandatory celibacy and clergy sexual abuse. Sexual abuse by Roman Catholic clergy is different from sexual abuse by other populations in almost every aspect of the victim/perpetrator profiles and characteristics, differences that can only be seen by segregating respective demographics and other specifics from general population abuse." Source Link

The Da Vinci code, based on a documented hoax, is much more defensible ground for the Church than the real-life conspiracy.


Comments
on May 27, 2006
'"The evidence is so strong that we can predict a continuation of the crime as long as mandatory celibacy exists in the priesthood." Further "A demonstrable link exists between mandatory celibacy and clergy sexual abuse. Sexual abuse by Roman Catholic clergy is different from sexual abuse by other populations in almost every aspect of the victim/perpetrator profiles and characteristics, differences that can only be seen by segregating respective demographics and other specifics from general population abuse."


It isn't really my business to tell people what to believe, but mandatory celibacy has never, ever worked. If you look at the history of the church a lot of the time it was accepted that that just meant the clergy wouldn't get married. They otherwise fooled around with impunity.

The common link between priests and clergy in other religions is they are trusted. You might think twice about dropping your pre-teen son off for an hour alone with the adoring neighbor, but people did so with priests and pastors without a second thought.

Here's one problem that I see with the concept that celibacy making it worse. Why are the usual victims male? You'd think if it was just men being starved for sexual attention they'd be off with the streetwalkers, or at the very least abusing girls.

For some reason, though, this is homosexual child abuse more often than not. When you hear about it in other religions it is often the same. It seems the more organized the religion, and the more the churches are governed by a hierarchy of authority, the worse it gets.

I differ with celibacy, but I can't really believe that it is the root of the problem. There is also in the Catholic tradition of segregating the sexes in their sexually formative years. Kids went to boys and girls schools, and were told that sweaty sports and the inevitable locker rooms would get their mind off that dirty sex stuff.

Of course it doesn't, and I believe it causes kids to seek what they find around them for their sexual desire. That is an unpopular opinion, though, because it implies that homosexuality is a choice, or at least an environmentally caused, instead of the "born gay" stuff that is the common imposition now.

My personal feeling is kids growing up institutionally, segregated with a bunch of kids their own sex unable to express their sexuality, will fixate on the people around them. I don't believe they outgrow that fixation, and later in life they are still attracted to the same sex and age. In order to really deal with that, though, you have to draw the fire of people who would see it as a threat to their concept of homosexuality.
on May 27, 2006
Thanks for commenting BakerStreet. I was hesitant to write this, but someone had to.

Here is an interesting link at AmericanCatholic.Org: Link

-- An overwhelming majority of the victims, 81 percent, were males. The most vulnerable were boys aged 11 to 14, representing more than 40 percent of the victims. This goes against the trend in the general U.S. society where the main problem is men abusing girls.
-- A majority of the victims were post-pubescent adolescents with a small percentage of the priests accused of abusing children who had not reached puberty.
-- Most of the accused committed a variety of sex acts involving serious sexual offenses.
-- The most frequent context for abuse was a social event and many priests socialized with the families of victims.
-- Abuses occurred in a variety of places with the most common being the residence of the priest.

on May 27, 2006
Oh, one more thought. The reason that I wrote this today was Cardinal O'Malley's act of penance, as cited in the Boston Globe:

Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley and 22 priests of the Archdiocese of Boston prostrated themselves on the altar of the Cathedral of the Holy Cross last night and asked forgiveness for the sins of the Catholic Church after hearing a survivor of clergy sexual abuse speak of his suffering.




on May 27, 2006
The stats in #2 there is exactly what I am talking about. That, to me, doesn't sound like men starved by lack of sex. That sounds more to me like an institution that either creates, or draws, a particular kind of molestor. If it were just men working in a position of authority you'd see lots of different kinds of people taken advantage of for sex.

I really have to wonder what percentage of abusive priests went to gender-segregated schools during their sexually formative years. It's like all the old derision of British boy's schools. I think people make use of what they have at hand when they are sex-crazed teens, and those tastes can stick.

Creepy picture you posted, to me, anyway. It doesn't at all give me the 'penance' vibe.
on May 31, 2006

Being a Catholic, I have the following observations to make.

First, only you could find a silver lining!  Very good.

Second, while the number of allegations are well documented, not all allegations are indeed actual abuses.  I personally (and I understand this is anecdotal) know of some that were and are complete hogwash.  Simply the piling on syndrome, some with malice aforethought, but others from disturbed people that 'shrinks' (I will not dignify them with a professional title as they are con artists and sharlatans) implanted a suggested memory (again no numbers, just first hand anecdotal cases).

Finally, while the issue of celibacy is a long and hotly argued one, the facts are not so cut and dried as some would like you to think.  For the highest divorce rate of any profession in the US is Protestant ministers.  And while the facts have not been documented on the number of protestant ministers that have committed abuses (there is no central controlling authority to blame or compile said statistics), the number is not an inconsequential one (and that goes for Jewish Rabbis as well).

I am not saying with the last issue that anyone denomination is more or less guilty.  But am refuting the Celebacy side of it.  What I am saying is that pedophiles seek out occupations with the easiest access to those they want to molest.  And Priest/ministers/Rabbis are one of the big areas they see as being easily accessible and a smorgasborg so to speak.

I have no doubt that Celibacy plays a role in the issue. but I think it is a much smaller issue than you and Baker tend to weight it.  The other causes are far more contributory to the crime than the fact that a man must practice celibacy.  There are many who are not in a position to interact with children, and who have taken that very vow.  Yet no one cares to mention them.

on Jun 02, 2006
"First, only you could find a silver lining! Very good."

Thank you, Dr. Guy. I like to think of myself as relentlessly positive!

Regarding the statistics, you know I am serious about my numbers. I used the Catholic Church's own accepted figures. Frankly I think that these are quite conservative and probably understate the issue. "And these only represent the number of REPORTED incidents that the Church found credible. Since most cases of sexual abuse are not reported, this may only be the tip of the iceberg. According to the report the true number may be 10 times higher."

But let us assume that "only" 4% of priests and other clergy are culpable. That is a horrific problem. But what is worse is the church's reaction....or lack thereof. How can an organization not react to this?

"Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein. And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them." Mark 10:14-16
on Jun 02, 2006

But let us assume that "only" 4% of priests and other clergy are culpable. That is a horrific problem. But what is worse is the church's reaction....or lack thereof. How can an organization not react to this?

I am not excusing the Church.  I cannot.  But I do question the numbers, as I said, based upon anecdotal evidence.  Not to lessen the impact, but only to ameliorate the instances.

I am not proud of it.  I am ashamed.  But lets not push more shame upon that which is not proven.

on Jun 03, 2006
I just finished a book called "Our Fathers" by David France. It was the most evil book I have ever read.

It chronicles the whole scandal starting from 1960 until the news broke in the Boston Papers in 2002 and then the aftermath.

Names, dates and places are used and documented. It was horrific. I couldn't believe what I was reading and how and why this was going on for so long. I would put it up there with the Nazis and what was done to their victims in WWII. The power behind the scenes was quite something.

Some of the events took place in and around Attleboro, MA so I called my sister in law there and asked her about it. She said she and her family left the church about three years earlier because of this. She found out that almost all the boys in her neighborhood were affected. She's in her 40's now and said all these boys (now men) had lives filled with drugs, alchohol and anger among other stuff trying to escape the memories of what happened to them.

It was very strongly put in the book that this goes alot deeper than many know and what the papers printed. The deep seeded anger in the victims extends to people around them for many years. One person affected can affect hundreds of people around him over the years and examples are given in the book.

Many are going to have alot to answer for someday. Our sins have a way of always finding us out.
on Jun 03, 2006
"But I do question the numbers"

The Catholic Church commissioned the John Jay College of Criminal Investigation to prepare the report.

"But lets not push more shame upon that which is not proven." On May 31st, four days ago as of this writing, a Dublin jury convicted a Roman Catholic priest Wednesday of raping a 13-year-old girl. There are literally too many convictions to list.

But I don't raise these issues to villify the Church. Cardinal O'Malley replaced Cardinal Law, who had acted to conceal incidents. Not my opinion, Cardinal Law was criticized by the Vatican. Yet instead of adopting a policy of open acknowledgement of the problem, Cardinal O'Malley continues a policy of concealment. The Archdiocese of Boston has paid out over $100 million dollars in "hush money."

Laying on a church floor for a few minutes (see above) isn't going to fix the problem.