The Reagan Legacy
Published on June 5, 2004 By Larry Kuperman In Politics
Ronald Reagan died today, at age 93, after a long bout with Alzheimer's disease. His legacy is a complicated one, but I would just like to share my thoughts as a person who lived through his two terms in office as the President of the United States.

Let me preface any further remarks by saying, candidly, I voted against him not once but twice. Despite that, I must say that the United States was a better place after his two terms in office. His accomplishments cannot be underestimated and we should remember him for what he did.

When Ronald Reagan took office, America was at one of the low points of our history. We stood helpless while Americans were held hostage in Tehran. Thirty minutes after Ronald Reagan took office, those hostages were on a plane home.

In the wake of Vietnam and Watergate, a malaise had gripped the American spirit. Ronald Reagan offered a vision, a sense of a strong America moving forward. Our economy was in a shambles, gripped by inflation. He used the White House as forum to get us moving again. His first two years in office we suffered the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression; but two years after that, most Americans were prospering.

His opponents, myself included, said he was two old to be President. Yet, this was a man who survived being shot and a month after a bullet lodged one inch from his heart, was standing in front of Congress, obviously back in control. He was also a man of great courage.

We often said that he was not smart enough to be President, didn't have a sufficient grasp of the issues. Yet he accomplished his goals, succeeded way beyond expectations. If you want to know Ronald Reagan, read his 1987 speech at the Berlin Wall, the famous "Tear down this wall" speech. Please take a moment to visit http://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan/speeches/wall.asp
In 1990, that wall fell.

Listen to his quips. This was a man who had a ready wit, who used laughter to help bring us together. Regarded as the antithesis of "cool," he quoted Springsteen in a speech. And in so doing, helped our nation to heal our divisions.

Regarded as the founder of the New Conservatism, he had a warm relationship with Mikhail Gorbachev of the Soviet Union. In his second term in office, he reduced the number of nuclear weapons.

Ronald Reagan was elected as a conservative, yet the deficit almost tripled in his two terms as President. He never managed to reduce the size of the American government. The Iran-Contra scandal marred his Presidency. So, he was not perfect. But Communism fell, the American economy recovered, we now felt that the problems of the world were solvable. Hope replaced cynicism, not just in America, but in the world. There is no question in my mind that we were all better off after eight years of Ronald Reagan's leadership, than before. Whether you were a Russian experiencing new freedom, a Berliner united with your family or an American back at work, you were better off. And that is the Ronald Reagan Legacy.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 05, 2004
Rest in peace frater Reagan!! A TKE for life and eternity!! You were one of the best!!!
on Jun 05, 2004
R.I.P. Frater Ronald Reagan. The greatest TKE of all time. Greatest Of All Time (GOAT)!! So long you old GOAT!!!!!
on Jun 05, 2004
Ohhhhh, I love Ronnie.

I'm reading his love letters to Nancy right now. He was an amazing writer, a real lover. I'm so sad that he died the way he did. I'd rather see him ride off into the sunset. perhaps that's what he did after all... Good bye President Reagan... our best president since John Adams....
on Jun 05, 2004
Thank you for your comments. I am not sure about the "best President since John Adams" part, but he certainly helped shape a more positive future for all.

I should just clarify one point. When I said that I voted against him twice, I meant I voted against him once in each of two different elections, not twice in the same election.
on Jun 05, 2004
As a conservative I could think of no better man to be a US president. My memories of him have all dimmed with time, but few can argue the good things he did for this country. One thing is for sure, he was a man, a gentleman, and a human. Not perfect but someone we all can say, was someone we could look to for inspiration. And his death should remind us all of the finallity of life. We may disagree, liberal and conservative, but I truly believe we all have our countries best instrests at heart. We should remember the things we do today will set the foundation for those who come after...we should all try to leave not just a mark...but our BEST mark...best for all. Pray for those who are cursed with Alzheimer's disease, and for a future cure.
on Jun 06, 2004
no individual is perfect. all great leaders often take decisions which have a lasting impact on humanity.at that moment, decisions may seem correct but later on decided on as wrong. but anyway, he was hell better than george bush. he is a scrouge on humanity.
on Jun 06, 2004
Reagan was just one more in a line of corporate shills. He ended the Cold War - or contributed to its ending? Very possibly... Fine. At the same time, however, he began the inexorable accelleration of its replacement, the "War on Drugs." No matter the freedom rhetoric. No matter all manner of deals with Contras, giving them free passes to ship tons of drugs into the U.S. so that they could use the money to buy guns, ect. His message in the huge increase in the WOD was that you don't own your body; the corporate state does.

And if "rights" are just something that the state doles out to its property to keep them happy, which is the underlying message, then why not go the next step, as has been done by the Bush II administration, and decide - as has been ratified by the courts so far - that non-citizens have no claim to rights. Hey, the camel was already in the tent with the WOD. The arrest and detention without trial or access to counsel or basic human conditions that we mandate for pet shelters, of alleged "enemy combattants," is just a corollary.

When and if the Amerikan public gets to the point of acting on principle, instead of on the premise that since we're the strongest, we get to set the rules to whatever "we" want, then a whole lot of things that Reagan, Bush I and II, Clinton and a host of others before them are going to come into serious question. The great thing about the Cold War and the Evil Empire was that it made us look good by comparison, and it "justified" cutting a lot of corners ethically. However, morality is not a option; it's the essense.

Our "founding fathers" for the most part recognized that, and, thus, neither our Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution restrict rights to some privileged group of "citizens" or exclude them from "enemy combattants." Having abandoned our basic moral principles on the grounds that we can get away with it, however, it may take a defeat on a par with NAZI Germany's to finally turn things around. Let's hope not...
on Jun 06, 2004

Okkkkayyyy...

on Jun 07, 2004
Some posts just exhaust me mentally!

Back to the point. As a Brit I do recall thinking at the time that Reagan was some sort of Mickey Mouse president, but when you look back at what he and Thatcher helped accomplish during that time in terms of really making the world a safer place he was incredibly impressive. I also recall that he maintained a huge amount of dignity and managed to focus on politics rather than the spin that we typically endure today. Reagan may not have been perfect in everything he did, but then again noone is. What should be remembered is that he did his best to make things better for everyone. He didn't always get it right but his intentions were well placed.

Maybe some of today's politicians should look back and take note rather that doing things like standing on the beaches of Normandy making thinly veiled references to Iraq rather than focussing on what they are supposed to be talking about.
on Jun 07, 2004
My esteemed colleague _Martin_ said "Some posts just exhaust me mentally!" You read them?

Back to the topic at hand. At the risk of sounding as though "I have not come here to praise Caesar, but to bury him" let me offer this comparison of Presidents Reagan and George W. Bush.

Both Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush have this in common: Despite both being elected as conservatives, neither practiced fiscal conservatism. Both used tax cuts to stimulate the economy, but neither matched those cuts with equal cuts in Federal spending, thus raising the deficit. During the Reagan era, the deficit basically tripled. We can debate whether it was Congress fault for not approving cuts to social programs, but regardless, the deficit increased. One could make the case that each President put this country back to work during difficult times, but at the expense of mortgaging our future. This is also part of the legacy.

During both administrations, there was a perception of a growing gap between the rich and the not-so-rich in America. Regardless of the actual numbers, that societal perception is problematic in that it contributes to fragmentation.

Yet both Presidents provided leadership, within the United States and the larger world community. While it is too early to evaluate President Bush's legacy, that is what we remember (and should remember) about President Reagan.


on Jun 07, 2004
the guy was witty and had some funny lines. However, he's proof only the good die young.
on Jun 07, 2004
During the Reagan era, the deficit basically tripled.


Didn't revenue double though? Plus, I believe that it was democrats in congress that were pushing spending increases, not Reagan.
on Jun 07, 2004
"it was democrats in congress that were pushing spending increases, not Reagan"
Ummm no. It was Reagan.
on Jun 07, 2004
This article criticises Bush 42, but it also points out that Reagan supported spending cuts.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb-0308-16.pdf
on Jun 07, 2004
cool! Thanks for providing a link.
2 Pages1 2